Announcement: XPRIZE and California Governor Gavin Newsom have partnered to design a Wildfire Prize – a direct result of efforts from the Future of Forests Impact Roadmap and its community members! Click here to learn more.

Barriers to Innovation

XPRIZEXPRIZE Los Angeles, CaliforniaPosts: 65 mod
An essential first step in our Zero-Waste Mining Prize Design process is to determine what barriers exist that prevent our problem (in this case, mining waste) from being solved. This is necessary so we know exactly that challenges a prize competition will have to overcome.

Some of the barriers we’ve identified can be summarized by the following:
  • Innovation in Mining is Challenging: due to risk aversion, long timescales, and variability of commodities, geologies, and geographies
  • Lack of External Pressure: whether from policy, investors, or the public, the emphasis is on management of waste rather than prevention or remediation
  • Lack of Awareness: whether it’s precisely knowing the composition of the rock or the waste, or even the very idea that waste can represent an opportunity
Is this list exhaustive? Is there anything else we should consider a barrier to solving the problem of mining waste? Is anything on our list actually not a barrier at all?

Comments

  • BryanNambaBryanNamba Posts: 6
    In addition to the barriers above, another challenge we have been considering is the lack of collaboration within the mining ecosystem. There seems to be distinct silos inside and outside the industry that make innovation and scaling the innovation challenging.
  • MostafaBMostafaB Posts: 1
    Downstream: Waste could be reused valorized, and if required, reprocessed (decontaminated), following flowsheets that must be optimized. Many economical benefits could becomes evident
  • santosrsantosr Guelph, CanadaPosts: 5
    When looking to replace traditional materials (e.g. sand, cement, limestone) with waste materials (tailings, slags, ashes), an important challenge is the composition of these wastes, as they frequently contain leachable metals, and some even contain radioactive elements and asbestiform fibers.
    Different jurisdictions have different regulations regarding re-use of waste materials (e.g. leaching standards), which further complicate technology development and dissemination across borders.
    Another important barrier is location of these wastes. In many mining-intensive countries (Canada, China, Russia, Brazil), mines are far from large urban centres (where the materials could be used), so transportation costs (large masses of low value) limit innovative possibilities (e.g. application in concrete or as soil amendment).
  • NickAzerNickAzer Portland, OR, USAPosts: 62 admin
    Thank you Rafael and Mostafa! @rsantos @MostafaB Our newest discussion has been posted about zero-footprint mining, based on results from our workshop at the CESCO conference - do you have any potential input on that subject? Any thoughts would be appreciated! We're excited about the possible direction.
  • alexhazbunalexhazbun ChilePosts: 2
    I think we may consider the "Anchorage trap": it is really difficult to imagine a completely new way to do something that have been stablished for so many years and at such great scale. I believe that one of the main challenge in the design of the prize is to avoid the anchorage of some techniques and "specialist knowledge". We need to question how to do mining without produce tailings, not about treating them. In my personal opinion, we need to question how to extract valuable materials from a rock with zero-waste thinking thinking that we are inventing mining.
  • DavidPoli DavidPoli Posts: 17 mod
    @alexhazbun I think you're aligned with the current thinking at XPRIZE. We are preparing parameters for a prize that we hope will create a paradigm shift in mining technology and change the way we think about the process. It's ambitious, be we hope also achievable. We'll be posting some more details soon...
  • DaveSummersDaveSummers Posts: 2
    @alexhazbun This goes back to the type of ore that is being mined. If the mineral can be separated, at the grain boundary from the host, without additional comminution, and this can be achieved at the mining face, then the volumes that must be transported and further treated is significantly lowered. This is possible, for eg with galena in sandstone and dolomite, and with some copper ores from Poland, but then one gets into the issues of sensing where the ore is, gaining access, and dealing with the material around the ore that is required for that access (though this can be reduced where people are no longer used in the vicinity of the face, or even underground).
Sign In or Register to comment.